[推荐]MCM答题技巧

Louby 发表于 2007-2-6 23:22

以下的建议摘自<a href="http://www.madio.net/kj/mcm/02Bj.pdf">http://www.madio.net/kj/mcm/02Bj.pdf</a> AMCM 2002 B题 评委的评论! Follow the instructions – Clearly answer all parts. – List all assumptions that affect the model and justify your use of those assumptions. – Make sure that your conclusions and results are clearly stated. – In the summary, put the “bottom line and managerial recommendation” results—not a chronological description of what you did. – Restate the problem in your words. • A CEO memorandum – Be succinct. – Include “bottom line and managerial results” answers. – Do not include methods used or equations. • Clarity and Style – Use a clear style and do not ramble. – A table of contents is very helpful to the judges. – Pictures, tables, and graphs are helpful; but you must explain them clearly. – Do not include a picture, table, or graph that is extraneous to your model or analysis. – Do not be verbose, since judges have only limited time to read and evaluate your paper. • The Model – Develop your model—do not just provide a laundry list of possible models. – Start with a simple model and then refine it. • Computer Programs – If a program is included, clearly define all parameters. – Always include an algorithm in the body of the paper for any code used. – If running a Monte Carlo simulation, be sure to run it enough times to have a statistically significant output. • Validation – Check your model against some known baseline. – Check sensitivity of parameters to your results. – Check to see if your recommendation/conclusions make common sense. Author/Judge’s Commentary 369 – Use real data. – The model should represent human behavior and be plausible. • Resources – All work needs to be original or referenced; a reference list at the end is not sufficient! – Teams can only use inanimate resources—no real people or people consulted over the Internet. – Surf the web but document sites where obtained information is used. – This problem lent itself to a literature search, but few teams did one. • Summary – This is the first piece of information read by a judge. It should be well written and contain the bottom-line answer or result. – This summary should motivate the judge to read your paper to see how you obtained your results. Judging The judging is accomplished in two phases. Phase I, at a different site, is “triage judging.” These are generally only 10-minute reads with a subjective scoring from 1 (worst) to 7 (best). Approximately the top 50% of papers are sent on the final judging. Phase II is done with different judges and consists of a calibration round and another subjection round based on the 1–7 scoring system. Then the judges collaborate to develop a 100-point scale to enable them to “bubble up” the better papers. Four or more longer rounds are accomplished using this scale, followed by a lengthy discussion of the last final group of papers. Reflections of Triage • Lots of good papers made it to the final judging. • The initial summary made a significant difference in the papers(results versus an explanation). • Report to the CEO also made a significant difference in papers.

glaxx 发表于 2007-2-7 00:37

太狡猾了！以下的建议摘自<a href="http://www.madio.net/kj/mcm/02Bj.pdf">http://www.madio.net/kj/mcm/02Bj.pdf</a> AMCM 2002 B题';">
评委的评论!评委的评论!';">    Follow the instructions – Clearly answer all parts. – List all assumptions that affect the model and justify your use of those assumptions. – Make sure that your conclusions and results are clearly stated. – In the summary, put the “bottom line and managerial recommendation” results—not a chronological description of what you did. – Restate the problem in your words. • A CEO memorandum – Be succinct. – Include “bottom line and managerial results” answers. – Do not include methods used or equations. • Clarity and Style – Use a clear style and do not ramble. – A table of contents is very helpful to the judges. – Pictures, tables, and graphs are helpful; but you must explain them clearly. – Do not include a picture, table, or graph that is extraneous to your model or analysis. – Do not be verbose, since judges have only limited time to read and evaluate your paper. • The Model – Develop your model—do not just provide a laundry list of possible models. – Start with a simple model and then refine it. • Computer Programs – If a program is included, clearly define all parameters. – Always include an algorithm in the body of the paper for any code used. – If running a Monte Carlo simulation, be sure to run it enough times to have a statistically significant output. • Validation – Check your model against some known baseline. – Check sensitivity of parameters to your results. – Check to see if your recommendation/conclusions make common sense. Author/Judge’s Commentary 369 – Use real data. – The model should represent human behavior and be plausible. • Resources – All work needs to be original or referenced; a reference list at the end is not sufficient! – Teams can only use inanimate resources—no real people or people consulted over the Internet. – Surf the web but document sites where obtained information is used. – This problem lent itself to a literature search, but few teams did one. • Summary – This is the first piece of information read by a judge. It should be well written and contain the bottom-line answer or result. – This summary should motivate the judge to read your paper to see how you obtained your results. Judging The judging is accomplished in two phases. Phase I, at a different site, is “triage judging.” These are generally only 10-minute reads with a subjective scoring from 1 (worst) to 7 (best). Approximately the top 50% of papers are sent on the final judging. Phase II is done with different judges and consists of a calibration round and another subjection round based on the 1–7 scoring system. Then the judges collaborate to develop a 100-point scale to enable them to “bubble up” the better papers. Four or more longer rounds are accomplished using this scale, followed by a lengthy discussion of the last final group of papers. Reflections of Triage • Lots of good papers made it to the final judging. • The initial summary made a significant difference in the papers(results versus an explanation). • Report to the CEO also made a significant difference in papers.

Louby 发表于 2007-2-7 08:56

layfree 发表于 2007-2-7 14:10

恩，不错，谢谢！！！

abluestrike 发表于 2007-2-7 16:38

ddddddddddddddddd

liuzhao 发表于 2007-2-12 20:38

二楼好人啊~~~~

ToStream 发表于 2007-2-12 21:42

做人不厚道

月过无声 发表于 2007-2-13 00:17

我靠怎么这样子没有天理了

cdd106117 发表于 2007-5-11 10:10

没金币

s447830824 发表于 2008-1-4 18:58

ba ta ti chu qu a !

页: [1] 2 3 4 5

数学建模社区-数学中国's Archiver

[推荐]MCM答题技巧