近几年美国赛MCM成绩评奖比例总结
2010 MCM2254 teams participated
Outstanding Winners (1/2%)
Finalists (1/2%)
Meritorious Winners (19%)
Honorable Mentions (24%)
Successful Participants (55%)
Unsuccessful Participants (1%)
2009 MCM
Outstanding Winners (1%)
Meritorious Winners (18%)
Honorable Mentions (18%)
Successful Participants (63%)
2008 MCM
Outstanding Winners (1%)
Meritorious Winners (13%)
Honorable Mentions (41%)
Successful Participants (44%)
Unsuccessful Participants (1%)
2007 MCM
Outstanding Winners (1%)
Meritorious Winners (13%)
Honorable Mentions (27%)
Successful Participants (59%)
2006 MCM
Outstanding Winners (2%)
Meritorious Winners (16%)
Honorable Mentions (25%)
Successful Participants (57%)
看样比例是老美胡来的。。。 以上都是从官网上找到的,评奖率每年都很高...针对一些同学对于奖状作用的大小,个人觉得随着每年参赛队数量的增加,奖状作用会降低但并非完全没用,有了总比没有要强的多...对于没有得奖的同学也大可不必伤心以后还会有机会.并且我相信经过了这些数学建模比赛你已经得到了很多无价的东西... 回复 zhanglei6-cumt 的帖子
很有道理,哈 {:3_61:}{:3_61:}{:3_61:}{:3_61:} {:3_41:}{:3_41:}{:3_41:}
页:
[1]