数学建模社区-数学中国

标题: 每日科技报告第91期 Big Bang Was Followed by Chaos [打印本页]

作者: 张立涛 时间: 2010-9-9 17:46
标题: 每日科技报告第91期 Big Bang Was Followed by Chaos
Big Bang Was Followed by Chaos, Mathematical Analysis Shows

Seven years ago Northwestern University physicist Adilson E. Motter conjectured that the expansion of the universe at the time of the big bang was highly chaotic. Now he and a colleague have proven it using rigorous mathematical arguments.

Time line of the Universe. (Credit: NASA)

The study, published by the journal Communications in Mathematical Physics, reports not only that chaos is absolute but also the mathematical tools that can be used to detect it. When applied to the most accepted model for the evolution of the universe, these tools demonstrate that the early universe was chaotic.

Certain things are absolute. The speed of light, for example, is the same with respect to any observer in the empty space. Others are relative. Think of the pitch of a siren on an ambulance, which goes from high to low as it passes the observer. A longstanding problem in physics has been to determine whether chaos -- the phenomenon by which tiny events lead to very large changes in the time evolution of a system, such as the universe -- is absolute or relative in systems governed by general relativity, where the time itself is relative.

A concrete aspect of this conundrum concerns one's ability to determine unambiguously whether the universe as a whole has ever behaved chaotically. If chaos is relative, as suggested by some previous studies, this question simply cannot be answered because different observers, moving with respect to each other, could reach opposite conclusions based on the ticks of their own clocks.

"A competing interpretation has been that chaos could be a property of the observer rather than a property of the system being observed," said Motter, an author of the ** and an assistant professor of physics and astronomy at Northwestern's Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences. "Our study shows that different physical observers will necessarily agree on the chaotic nature of the system."

The work has direct implications for cosmology and shows in particular that the erratic changes between red- and blue-shift directions in the early universe were in fact chaotic.

Motter worked with colleague Katrin Gelfert, a mathematician from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and a former visiting faculty member at Northwestern, who says that the mathematical aspects of the problem are inspiring and likely to lead to other mathematical developments.

An important open question in cosmology is to explain why distant parts of the visible universe -- including those that are too distant to have ever interacted with each other -- are so similar.

"One might suggest 'Because the large-scale universe was created uniform,'" Motter said, "but this is not the type of answer physicists would take for granted."

Fifty years ago, physicists believed that the true answer could be in what happened a fraction of a second after the big bang. Though the initial studies failed to show that an arbitrary initial state of the universe would eventually converge to its current form, researchers found something potentially even more interesting: the possibility that the universe as a whole was born inherently chaotic.

The present-day universe is expanding and does so in all directions, Motter explained, leading to red shift of distant light sources in all three dimensions -- the optical analog of the low pitch in a moving siren. The early universe, on the other hand, expanded in only two dimensions and contracted in the third dimension.

This led to red shift in two directions and blue shift in one. The contracting direction, however, was not always the same in this system. Instead, it alternated erratically between x, y and z.

"According to the classical theory of general relativity, the early universe experienced infinitely many oscillations between contracting and expanding directions," Motter said.

"This could mean that the early evolution of the universe, though not necessarily its current state, depended very sensitively on the initial conditions set by the big bang."

This problem gained a new dimension 22 years ago when two other researchers, Gerson Francisco and George Matsas, found that different descriptions of the same events were leading to different conclusions about the chaotic nature of the early universe. Because different descriptions can represent the perspectives of different observers, this challenged the hypothesis that there would be an agreement among different observers. Within the theory of general relativity, such an agreement goes by the name of a "relativistic invariant."

"Technically, we have established the conditions under which the indicators of chaos are relativistic invariants," Motter said. "Our mathematical characterization also explains existing controversial results. They were generated by singularities induced by the choice of the time coordinate, which are not present for physically admissible observables."

Motter also is an assistant professor of engineering sciences and applied mathematics at the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science, a member of the executive committee of the Northwestern Institute on Complex Systems (NICO) and a member of the Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA).

作者: sea_star666 时间: 2010-9-9 17:51
支持一下

作者: linhero 时间: 2010-9-9 18:55
不错。。。。。。。。。。。

作者: 江汉大侠 时间: 2010-9-9 20:00
试试运气啦~~~~~~~~~~~

作者: sunhaibin 时间: 2010-9-9 20:00
强烈支持。楼主万岁

作者: 781146442 时间: 2010-9-9 20:15
太伟大了
只是看不懂

作者: 781146442 时间: 2010-9-9 20:16
这东西太深奥了

作者: echofly 时间: 2010-9-9 21:51
支持、、、顶一下~~~~~~

作者: 362514 时间: 2010-9-10 08:00
我回不抢呢考虑再三还是不抢了吧 ^_^

作者: caobin 时间: 2010-9-10 11:39
楼主的帖子实在是写得太好了。可是我立刻想到，这么好的帖子，倘若别人看不到，那么不是浪费楼主的心血吗？经过痛苦的思想斗争，我终于下定决心，牺牲小我，奉献大我。我要拿出这帖子奉献给世人赏阅，我要把这个帖子一直往上顶，往上顶！顶到所有人都看到为止！

作者: regoliu 时间: 2010-9-10 11:51
哦～～

作者: rchjia 时间: 2010-9-10 12:00
强人，佩服死了。呵呵，不错啊

作者: duhaiming 时间: 2010-9-10 15:00
试试运气啦~~~~~~~~~~~

作者: ahang 时间: 2010-9-10 20:00
我要把这个帖子一直往上顶，往上顶！

作者: 星期九 时间: 2010-9-11 08:00
呵呵大家好奇嘛来观看下~~~~

作者: ken_he 时间: 2010-9-11 12:00
强人，佩服死了。呵呵，不错啊

作者: rhyacinthus 时间: 2010-9-11 15:00
鉴定完毕！

作者: lynn1985 时间: 2010-9-11 20:00
强人，佩服死了。呵呵，不错啊

作者: 橘子先生 时间: 2010-9-12 08:00
声明一下：本人看贴和回贴的规则，好贴必看，精华贴必回。

作者: brainyrain 时间: 2010-9-12 12:00
楼主那种裂纸欲出的大手笔，竟使我忍不住一次次的翻开楼主的帖子……

作者: cclbbt 时间: 2010-9-12 15:01
我要把这个帖子一直往上顶，往上顶！

作者: clarke1110 时间: 2010-9-12 20:00
我要把这个帖子一直往上顶，往上顶！

作者: josephshi 时间: 2010-9-13 08:00
来报道!!!!!!!!!!!

作者: 星竹石 时间: 2010-9-13 12:00
我回不抢呢考虑再三还是不抢了吧 ^_^

作者: sunhe 时间: 2010-9-13 15:00
强烈支持。楼主万岁

作者: chunsong 时间: 2010-9-13 20:00
强人，佩服死了。呵呵，不错啊

作者: Xiesdl 时间: 2010-9-14 08:00
呵呵大家好奇嘛来观看下~~~~

作者: ljk_770 时间: 2010-9-14 12:00
试试运气啦~~~~~~~~~~~

作者: ifly 时间: 2010-9-14 15:00
声明一下：本人看贴和回贴的规则，好贴必看，精华贴必回。

作者: xtmlj 时间: 2010-9-14 20:00
声明一下：本人看贴和回贴的规则，好贴必看，精华贴必回。

作者: tom-ww 时间: 2010-9-15 08:00
楼主，你写得实在是太好了。我惟一能做的，就只有把这个帖子顶上去这件事了

作者: dreamboy 时间: 2010-9-15 12:00
顶顶更健康，越顶吃的越香。

作者: qxy1207 时间: 2010-9-15 15:00
楼主，你写得实在是太好了。我惟一能做的，就只有把这个帖子顶上去这件事了

作者: xingyuhua 时间: 2010-9-15 20:00
我基本上是采用看英语文章的办法，先泛读，再精读，再一句一句看，最后再提纲挈领，总算是明白一点了，当然，也可能还是领悟错了。最后要说的一句话是：楼主，你很牛叉，希望你不是真的有病。

作者: zxc6604 时间: 2010-9-15 20:00
我要把这个帖子一直往上顶，往上顶！

作者: wins 时间: 2010-9-16 12:00
我来了~~~~~~~~~ 闪人~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

作者: leuse 时间: 2010-9-16 15:00
楼主，你写得实在是太好了。我惟一能做的，就只有把这个帖子顶上去这件事了

作者: tengfei110 时间: 2010-9-16 20:00
留个脚印```````

欢迎光临数学建模社区-数学中国 (http://www.madio.net/)