标题: 2012年二等奖论文 [打印本页] 作者: 刘李 时间: 2013-1-27 19:08 标题: 2012年二等奖论文 2012 Mathematical Contest in Modeling (MCM) Summary Sheet9 Z- v* d2 ]1 _# B6 [' a& B A/ D
Locating the conspirators in the company # ^& D" Q% Z+ _! t& G- ?5 FThe mathematical model built in this paper can analyze the complex crime reasonably. According/ ^+ Z' N3 _) K" `/ q! |
to a part of known arrested suspects and their social relationship, the model can discover the & i; i1 T3 ]6 yconspirator with the maximum possibility, which can accelerate the process of investigating cases 5 w4 n2 U- ~- s1 E' h( c0 R( GWith the the suspicious information, known conspirators and innocents, a model of finding- J) O. Q, e6 l" U8 W
internal crime suspects in the company is established. For a person in the company, if he has; ^! L1 O: b9 E. U3 K( l# R
closer contact with other members he will has more possibility to commit a crime, which is called1 M, o+ v' }$ O3 d0 _. K4 n7 a
core degree. Making use of Matrix replacement method and Hierarchical clustering method, we5 D* t2 `3 M N$ g) l
can find the group of higher core degree and sort them with descending. Next, we deem that a. i7 P! j: ]* @9 [4 L) N' R' p
member who has closer contact with a conspirator will be more possibilily a conspirator . Because0 y/ i& m% \6 K1 y1 L% X2 p$ {- J
of the known conspirators in the company, to find the other suspects in the network sturcture, A6 {% v) D' e/ }5 F: H
list of association degree is ordered with ascending. At last, on the basis of the computational H3 H( z! J- [, J( r0 k- Umodel, taking transmission information among members into acount, we stratified these message / Q0 A# }% I6 atopics and given the different layers of different topics of suspicious degrees. According to the% s3 f' W+ e# x/ Q
different topics among these members, we can calculate their suspicious degrees accurately and / {! G1 y: r: w& V5 x3 i# cordered them descending. Analysis by synthesis the result of three sort, using a computer merge/ ?' v. M* H @$ Y& \
the result of three sort, thereby all of the suspects is obtained accurately.! L' P& T) I8 F7 ]
Computers is the efficient and accurate tools to handle and analyze large-scale data. Using) a' z+ C f: F' d9 o5 i9 z3 ^
computers to deal with original data can reduce the error of the value of topics. We can make full ) ?8 n! U8 y/ z! a! Quse of semantic network analysis, artificial intelligence and text analysis, and calculate the 3 H3 o W, d( X& E4 t6 j9 _" |# @frequency of words in original data . There are some less important but greater frequent words 6 J9 R! K7 T5 j( `4 Namong those data, such as copula and personal pronouns. Deleting this type of words and merge # O3 ~6 i1 Q/ L+ ~ [them with similar semantic words, a language bank is then built with these similar words, and the 2 ]* v( p5 X2 [ dfrequency of every words is computed. Sometimes words collocation in the bank are also ; J0 f. O4 E) w$ j5 }+ ?suspicious. therefore when these suspicious words appear and the frequency of them is high, thus5 ~8 F' a d! Z0 ?% Q
the person who transmit the type of information must be suspicious characters. It suffice to find 2 s7 j2 ^4 U7 x6 call of suspects accurately by this method.1 @; B5 \5 j: C3 q
The crime busting model we built can also apply to many other practical cases. For example, it: l7 B: j: l6 v) z0 V
can be used on detecting difficult network-crime cases and applied to the problem of the spread of4 L; z5 k% T/ E& q, {
the virus between cells in the biological network. The method can also deal with these difficulties / j g2 _( k$ u: l1 K4 Rwith high accuracy. Z3 ]6 w5 P8 x. l7 G
Locating the conspirators in the company Abstract The mathematical model built in this paper can analyze the complex crime reasonably. According to a part of known arrested suspects and their social relationship, the model can discover the conspirator with the maximum possibility, which can accelerate the process of investigating cases With the the suspicious information, known conspirators and innocents, a model of finding internal crime suspects in the company is established. For a person in the company, if he has closer contact with other members he will has more possibility to commit a crime, which is called core degree. Making use of Matrix replacement method and Hierarchical clustering method, we can find the group of higher core degree and sort them with descending. Next, we deem that a member who has closer contact with a conspirator will be more possibilily a conspirator . Because of the known conspirators in the company, to find the other suspects in the network sturcture, A list of association degree is ordered with ascending. At last, on the basis of the computational model, taking transmission information among members into acount, we stratified these message topics and given the different layers of different topics of suspicious degrees. According to the different topics among these members, we can calculate their suspicious degrees accurately and ordered them descending. Analysis by synthesis the result of three sort, using a computer merge the result of three sort, thereby all of the suspects is obtained accurately. Computers is the efficient and accurate tools to handle and analyze large-scale data. Using computers to deal with original data can reduce the error of the value of topics. We can make full use of semantic network analysis, artificial intelligence and text analysis, and calculate the frequency of words in original data . There are some less important but greater frequent words among those data, such as copula and personal pronouns. Deleting this type of words and merge them with similar semantic words, a language bank is then built with these similar words, and the frequency of every words is computed. Sometimes words collocation in the bank are also suspicious. therefore when these suspicious words appear and the frequency of them is high, thus the person who transmit the type of information must be suspicious characters. It suffice to find all of suspects accurately by this method. The crime busting model we built can also apply to many other practical cases. For example, it can be used on detecting difficult network-crime cases and applied to the problem of the spread of the virus between cells in the biological network. The method can also deal with these difficulties with high accuracy. Keywords: core degrees, suspicious degrees, association degrees, text analysis, crime busting- P# j- Q+ k! d/ X/ V3 ^
Team#15783 page 2 of 153 f' n+ ]! ^$ J; I6 A
Contents# S. t9 h& }$ B, z ?+ u) E/ F. W
1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 3 , k8 I! h" V( D' r; N8 C; y/ Q2 Analysis of the Problem ............................................................................................ 3# y& a( O: \4 s. @
3 Crime busting ............................................................................................................ 4 # x7 p9 c! z$ `3 h8 e$ `: r3.1 Analysis ............................................................................................................ 4 5 j7 z, O) z' j5 K3.2 Symbols ............................................................................................................ 4 g+ n9 E4 g+ |7 ?
3.3 Assumption ...................................................................................................... 5+ P& v' j* l( x7 s7 `7 k7 e
3.4 Modeling .......................................................................................................... 5 ' b; ?; W8 v+ s" H: O; \3.4.1 Solving of the core degree ..................................................................... 5# r% V' i1 i* E, g8 C
3.4.2 Solving of absolutely close degree ........................................................ 6* ?/ V5 u/ x- I; N; l9 c, P$ e
3.4.3 Using suspected information to find criminal suspects ..................... 7 + s9 t" C% Q; p7 W* N d" a3.5 Consider the additional datas ........................................................................ 9 $ K- P: f {: u0 Y4 Computer processing .............................................................................................. 10 " j& P1 e+ E, m! u! V$ J, Z4.1 Analysis .......................................................................................................... 10 6 {; p3 d" h" D, l+ q7 k3 i4 _4.2 Definition ....................................................................................................... 11 " h: V/ a0 [& |0 s3 m3 _; M4.3 Computer processing Method ...................................................................... 11 , G9 M7 `# s" r% Y4 c7 l' g+ P5 Model promotion ..................................................................................................... 13 ! P* \6 y3 Q+ |9 ^+ x0 W5.1 Analysis of model .......................................................................................... 13. U3 z/ W8 R- m6 k( l' \+ N$ L9 Q T
5.2 Model application.......................................................................................... 13: ]% `( R4 A, y( N
6 Weaknesses and Strengths of the Model ............................................................... 14 + K! \4 N' r1 k/ q% [) y6.1 Strengths ........................................................................................................ 147 B9 V) Z( }( [
6.2 Weaknesses .................................................................................................... 14) h/ ?+ i( {5 i: [+ F
7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 15% q% ~2 [2 X: _
8 References ................................................................................................................ 15 + o! ?+ _9 N2 ^2 g: h4 BTeam#15783 page 3 of 15! T- T2 `; s3 I5 o8 |
1 Introduction 3 p5 d3 R6 w, p; b$ R) d$ d# uIn recent years, the group frauds and economic crime problems have been very common in our daily life. Since the number of suspects is great, then it is difficult to detect the cases for the public security organs. Once the criminals escape, they will be a threat to more people and property, and even to personal security . The links between criminals posed by criminal networks is complex , and the mistake of judgment will falsely accuse innocent people and let the criminals get off . Here the problem arises: how to locate all the suspicion without a mistake? We learned many of the existing methods find that none give us a definite answer. Then we found the model of crime busting is similar to the model of social networks in the BBS in a way. What we need to do is identify the core characters and important figures in this matter. If we do the above, then we can basically determine the degree of suspicion for each person in this group combined with all kinds of the message topics, and arrange the guesswork out of suspects. It narrow the scope of criminal elements and reduce the workload of the public security organs so that they can break cases faster. $ J! z8 D) q( ^. P# P5 |2 Analysis of the Problem4 A9 T3 z) s/ c( b1 H
First, we should gain a clear idea of the characteristics of internal crime. There is a wide range of the criminal subjects: the senior managers of the company can be the conspirator, and each of the staffs can be also the conspirator. So it is difficult to capture criminals. But if we use the key features of economic crime, then we can easily find the mastermind of their accomplices. 5 Y" F: c3 i. j- V According to the characteristics of crime and the offender's psychological, we believe that the possibility that those persons who keep close contact with criminals are the conspirators is very large. Then, by known criminals and suspicious messages, we can accurately determine criminal conspirators. $ T0 v/ t$ ~( G6 N Based on the known contacts between persons inside the company, we use the matrix displacement method and the hierarchical clustering method to identify the company's central figures who keep close contact with other employees. Then combining with these figures with the types of message topics, we can make a further judgment to identify the other suspects. In addition, using given already certain schemers and certain not schemers, we can further discuss the group which have close relationship with those persons, and so we can increase the veracity of the result. With the help of our model, we can identify the maximum possible accomplices and confidently point out the conspirators and accomplices within the company.( X6 g) q: K: \) j0 n" q% O; y; S
Team#15783 page 4 of 15 - M. g9 T- r, Y! Q+ U3 Crime busting. s! s& `9 e5 L' [ s# T9 u: a4 G" E
3.1 Analysis & y; @9 x7 _0 P: r n0 vAlthough criminals choose randomly the modality of crime information and the route0 O& c! W# C" m+ ?4 G& Q
transmission of crime information, but their crime form still has a certain rule. Their' f M) Z# U u
modus operandi in this company transmits mainly by the information transfer form, so # \& u. I: ~- ^9 }criminal gangs should form a network connection model. Questions have given3 ^4 H0 }3 G$ A; i& M0 i! M8 K- N8 p
several already certain criminals and crime information types, then according to these5 {$ z* z4 z; W) o4 w( L! t* z, r3 N
criminals' close relationship and the suspected degrees of total numbers of message* ~, J1 Q% y1 }8 f- E
receive and message issued, we can judge the scope of the criminals.9 t. g( w) H3 L
3.2 Symbols 7 j/ t9 v7 y, A2 w+ BTable1 symbols & g7 j; ~ O5 E/ jk A The number of the company group members + O9 O+ [3 t/ y7 s t |) ^( d# \ai, k if member i and member k have directly connected 0 X' ]8 u* x& d4 r D C k Connection degree of each member k A ( [: M/ c1 M& \ f& h5 X2 U- H ij g k if means of member i A and member j A pass by k A .9 O f7 r: g8 n5 f/ M' _2 q
C k B k A ’s absolute agent degree 4 W* c7 E6 ^6 U5 [0 @li, k the most short-circuit path length of member i A and member j A * q6 E3 s6 i e9 [% u C C k the absolutely tight density ) M" [- I0 ^6 _ \# g" c. kD C the average value of the absolute agent degree- R# P, W' e8 O1 o! f! ]! _4 F" M
B C the average value of the absolute agent degree! d, I, E& E+ X& ?: j
C C the average value of the closely degree % z3 K }- I2 q7 v9 M9 \ D Dev C the smooth coefficient of connection degree. Q7 h0 r3 t9 n T; B
B Dev C the smooth coefficient of absolute agent / q& e" c/ `5 k' c' X C Dev C the smooth coefficient of absolutely tight density" A4 @, ?9 H* L5 k
Team#15783 page 5 of 15, f, _* x' W+ R% [: C, \/ T
3.3 Assumption ; E- w4 m# R9 X2 Z There is no message exchange without the message in the problem;( v+ q% b% a' z" f" M
Assume that all the criminals in the group is given; 8 Z$ ~- x9 c- A" X1 ] To measure the possibility of a crime, we define suspect degree of message which- t( @, {7 @0 c( g
is divided into four layers. Suspect degree of the information within each layer is $ Z& e8 _- h1 T/ q& E& }4 j" B* h$ Lthe same. The messages from the same layer have the same suspects degree.2 ?1 F) `$ I( T6 e: u
3.4 Modeling" g7 M4 \ V8 ^5 ]6 C% v
3.4.1 Solving of the core degree 4 ~5 C! o7 f2 `3 B# zIn this article, we need to study the company group consisted of 83 members. There G. @& @. O- a# r# u: O
are different degrees of interaction among people, and we can obtain the extent of this * {" x7 D' Z) ^" y4 xinteraction via information passing between different people. The person who has the - Z% c! P& [* P8 j! ~; ulargest amount of messages has the greatest influence without considering message6 q3 p6 s: U4 Y3 W3 k8 Q2 n
topics, then we call this person as the central figure. His position is far above the other : i+ [- f( X9 f. _opinion leaders because he has the most members of the exchange relationships. We ; W o8 j; e$ vcall the person as a loner due to the fewest numbers of information received and. @% A, r) m b" Z9 C
information issued. This person does not influence the others, then those loners are1 ^0 M, V/ }" m* D! [
not criminals in our case. The central figure and important figures have a great/ N* F9 U# h2 H: Z6 Q v# a( c
possibility to commit a crime. - J; ?$ p# X( a/ X; _. w; l" aRelationship analysis focuses on the relationship between members and interactive 3 i- _/ t$ J6 B$ fbehavior, and it is often used to identify the central figure of groups[4]. Let the symbol( [) P- X. o6 Y' u
1 2 , , , n V A A A stand for the members of this group, and define as follows: ; e+ p) }" |- G& ~) {' c$ { ( T% [$ B0 X' i, K- y
- \# ~9 f8 N0 ^( B
n% K3 L* w( r7 e" F1 \
i; C! J" K3 C/ _
D C k a i k % n# |+ s# Z$ f4 ?% h0 B- v1 ! E2 g ]1 b0 y& U q, @, (1). k$ Y% l) ?. Q' W+ O2 o; p0 Z
Equation (1) stands for Connection Degree of each member k A , and Connection3 d3 G0 F+ }) d3 y$ y5 A, |
Degree reflects the level of activity of the group members. Let n be the number of 1 m0 ?% b% B# f) Q( F% zmembers of groups and n equals 83 in this problem. If ai,k 1, then member i 5 v; A3 Q0 W6 C4 w3 f0 _9 cand member k have direct connection, that is, member i and member k have - I( j) c3 {5 {) Rinformation exchanges. If ai,k 0 , then both have no directly connection with& j& r2 x8 j/ n1 P# H- k
each other, and so have no information exchanges.# u- s' u% h) w! C2 q e
) I% \, n! ^/ O4 _; \3 u _
n ; P' i. t# f/ q; O: r' u- yi * e- u4 Y3 ^. v: g6 H! y+ L: @, fn# |/ v7 `" g. {0 X$ @2 y
j 0 j1 `, G' W$ G( K: h5 d- ]B ij C k g k (2): |1 r5 i4 G/ u% ?% {
Team#15783 page 6 of 15# y' g) p% y& v0 W# k' o
The shortest circuit path number that passes member k A is called k A ’s absolute ; A% y5 Y7 B P5 t: `/ U8 `& `3 k& Dagent degree, denoted byC k B . It describes the ability of members contacting other2 N" Q* m7 M8 A6 k- x
members as an intermediary. If g k 1 ij , then member i A and member j A pass + V$ q- S5 o- p$ a5 Y5 Qby member k A .& [8 {+ m- i, s: {
- T$ ^( v) M' a4 u5 B, c
) f: \1 K! w' O3 u" R1 G$ V6 q5 `n , o8 v5 `$ `7 w2 |, o6 I6 _i4 [" ^7 h) p/ U7 a
C C k l i k 1 a, j; f+ [: |* o ?: i1 2 }6 _" z$ @% x3 G# ^. e, (3) 8 P# s1 v4 I0 h" x2 }7 iThe shortest circuit path length of member k A with all other members in the- q+ |# b% W8 \, I
network called absolutely tight density, denoted by C k C . The li, k means the4 a9 K1 I v' N- E" L
shortest circuit path length of member i A and member j A . What Equation (3) 3 F. N+ P/ _* l$ e3 D% adescribes is the close degree of a member of the small group with himself as center. 3 I% a" U+ s$ |1 \* [4 V n5 | D eCvD * t( G3 f) E$ h: V- D5 R1 H, |, G
C C# w8 H5 X! Y* _7 F# M* o& v- }
D e CvB 8 u: D0 s: X, p1 B' XB B# M5 r5 R/ t6 k5 W
D e CvD / l! e6 o" J+ UD D C C C C C C c o r e e e 7 v! i- y0 {# `6 h" M2 / 2 / 2 / ( K5 ?; D+ o7 e; ~ (4) / X( D8 i7 H+ Y! E# c, I) ^Equation (1) generally considers the importance of connection degree, absolute agent3 p& W4 H" i$ w" C6 H9 e: U
degree and absolutely tight density. Using this we can measure the core degree of ( s3 \. D# R2 ~' Q7 ~character member. Given D C represent the average value of member contacts degree.! q/ ^8 {# r% f2 @2 l
8 `- G* s2 z0 q : ^. t# s$ T0 `- B2 ?6 J) w
n0 K/ ?" w3 E' w
i w8 ?% y9 X0 M2 [- h: oD D D Dev C C i C ; ?2 [5 H& h1 u5 B% C1 - I1 A- E8 J; s- g# }1 N2 means the smooth coefficient of connection degree. 7 M& g% _4 c" Q0 P& e9 |" _% y! n& n ; {% A& i" j4 ^* I" x$ v 2 S* c9 d( }) g7 {: E& }8 \n& D/ u$ \, x, v% y
i6 j; o. W& E: Y4 @1 n# {
B B B Dev C C i C ! C5 J4 K% y/ a1 ( K% Y7 K/ P/ P2 ~( `2 means the smooth coefficient of absolute agent degree. ' v; _& o. {4 {( H. |/ v0 R4 i ( ?4 B( Y0 ^& c' h% Q/ d/ e& e
" L+ M7 m7 p7 Y7 Y: k$ Xn% {6 }' Q; `. R. K1 r
i / K# a3 c8 t' |C C C Dev C C i C 4 h f1 W8 i6 @1 - ]% u% E. P2 g4 @2 means the smooth coefficient of absolutely tight density." w' }" ~. K( A
Thus, we can obtain the core degree of all members by using computer program, and! E" Z/ C( [4 U- d0 O
then rank the core degree with decreasing order. * p: X$ \7 b! l& I5 R0 F4 P8 Q3.4.2 Solving of absolutely close degree 4 v5 E4 v/ k6 ?0 Q# v# Z7 HCommon sense shows that an accomplice may have frequent contact with criminals, 7 \6 i" l- }* F- Y, h. l2 Kso they will have a larger absolutely close degree. We can regard the kown 8 H3 Y3 }, E+ ]' vconpirators as a group. Calculate the absolutely close degree of each members to this / ?" _/ c7 R' v, L) B! wgroup.% f& v) e" [6 n5 W
Using the expression (3) to find the absolutely close degree with criminal suspects of2 b1 y$ \% m! L9 ^+ K. V
everybody in the company. Regarding all of these criminal suspects as a group, $ f- L. j7 K$ u3 v; ]- qcalculate the sum of the compactness between crime groups and every individual( d- V( g2 ~, W: F( e- D1 k8 A
Team#15783 page 7 of 15, Q" I! f/ O1 g0 Y& l0 N J
person, that is the value of number means the degree of close contact with each 1 H5 t5 K/ F' v rindividual and criminal groups. Calculate the result using computer programming., y3 S$ r: H0 y ?3 F6 ]
Size down the absolutely close degree, we can find people who have closer contact |+ I% |# m. x+ K# x3 ]0 q; H8 N" l
with this crime group. 2 T# U! V. X: a, V3 \3 l3.4.3 Using suspected information to find criminal suspects9 l) p) I! U9 ^7 z; v
Step1: Suspected to information stratification j4 O# F# `" z/ E! \. T \8 g; w- f+ RExcept for certain suspected information, according to the characteristics of the 1 T9 r5 T9 R o o. wcorporate crime, we confirm that remaining information has relationship with the - z8 v! Q9 X# C) c3 e8 M$ Gbudget and economic, internal personnel dispatch and daily life. In daily life, for the * t h% o$ [4 cstandard of stratification, we roughly divide it into the following levels:! F6 d1 s V; ^ a2 e; C# @
A. 7, 11, 13 is defined certain suspected information, and set the value of suspected 2 ^+ L* V+ e& B d- c/ J8 E' _5 T2 idegree information at 1; / F3 ~7 s2 m8 H% Q0 u OB. 1, 14, 2 is defined as the larger suspected degrees information, and set the value of * t! A9 ^, H5 {) z( r! T8 c/ s, |suspected degree information at 0.75;! Q* G' O. f5 Q+ g" c8 C
C. 5, 6, 10, 15 is defined as the smaller suspected degrees information, and set the% y+ B2 ^# P( g7 z% ^" y0 F7 [
value of suspected degree information at 0.5;- z# L3 P J0 C" {; T
D. 3, 4, 8, 9, 12 is defined as the smallest suspected degrees information, and set the# }; n- [$ v" b1 ^
value of suspected degree information at 0.25; * c% H# f1 u1 ^7 H0 c! U. kStep2: Building matrix 2 F/ j; f4 k7 i: P/ q( [According to the types of information received and information sent, we draw out the$ U# U9 I6 r0 z
matrix, and the row and column of the matrix mean individual numbers. 1 ij z 1 }: j' Q! J! U6 Zmeans the individual staff received or sent out the information type is A, 0.75 ij z ! F% R3 x: b: K( G& ~( S, J3 t7 h) p
means the individual staff received or sent out the information type is B, 0.5 ij z & v( B7 p2 d0 o+ V+ n1 {% p# ~means the individual staff received or sent out the information type is C, 0.25 ij z ) R0 M, K& h2 v- n+ f! `8 p9 G2 S
means the individual staff received or sent out the information type is D. As a result, / I3 Z; m l4 b5 j7 twe get a matrix of 8383." R6 u a! m' s4 z! H! w, c
Team#15783 page 8 of 15 . Q: H/ i% O5 Z: x0 0 1 . 2 5 0 0 0 # T1 h+ A. Y* F3 G" B/ w+ Y0 02 w# h2 c: }0 a& D" _
2.25 05 h0 e4 r7 I4 t, `# d
0 0 ' |: {0 }( k) k+ ^0 0 / c% h9 c7 @; j; Z0 0 0 0 0 0. I8 {# C4 T8 `( x* Y2 c
7 j8 ]! i) A) O
% D/ s. l4 e0 E2 N# P/ w3 I9 i
- a7 b$ |% u5 [, ?/ h0 p; f1 k* X8 ^8 @/ M
( b9 e, y7 p, `1 F$ \0 z
! o# W- B5 r" {8 C8 ]) x
4 ^1 K* Q. `& i5 ~ , u6 k; Q9 K* k; d; n / l' N( A9 }7 f8 F; t& {. v / }7 D* u) \' f% e/ Z $ ]4 L( f _8 l* B ! H7 [. V' [6 o# P: q
8 {" Z9 S ]- w: |0 X
" j% l, H8 L4 A+ D
3 K5 p" e: o& H$ n( c& p+ X% C
& x+ ]3 ]" o1 }
' I d9 t4 M: C 6 [% B* V3 v( j. j$ X! V/ r+ ~ 6 I1 o7 S0 n5 W: _% h(5)( a3 T% Z9 l. U6 \
Step3: Evaluating the suspected degrees 1 _# `7 n% n t6 F' n, WAccording to the expression: ) i1 B! \* n; v+ }2 K- `. l * Y. o+ O9 a2 q/ Y# ~! [
( |, c+ A. q- ^& a* L% w; o" Q: C
3 K% |& G v1 {: S# i+ X
4 z7 W1 E8 x4 C' [( e 83 * r( `9 _/ q" @( E& H1 + k5 k6 ^. R0 K83 8 Q$ w1 T& `0 T1 g: C9 Q" e1 + Q) l$ r+ i3 hi ' g5 e/ K& t3 j1 k3 kij' r3 B8 R- U7 A! z
i % l U: f9 ~) ^ij C& k$ V% D I2 T! o
A2 _; ]- D) w9 _( j5 \. J0 @5 I
a % ]8 e0 U6 y/ }4 [- JB k (6) 5 u5 U% @6 i0 V/ n0 @Note: Bk stands for the k th's information of suspected degrees, ij a stands for ' r( S1 u4 d, \0 q/ Gthe value of the i th row and the j th colunm in the matrix,* t# R v4 h' ?8 S6 d
1 0 , C2 x8 K- W: P& H- y3 o5 h. U0 0 7 W# I6 P! b5 I8 u& s5 Jij$ E% r/ z% S4 {# R, N* o
ij, V- b$ b% O" p1 y( O0 C% V* W- w* E
ij2 h3 s/ Y) O+ K5 V
if a i/ y4 l1 d2 t2 \* \5 @9 t
A 8 g1 ]" t3 m6 j8 I. _' {) x& f- vif a! x' I ]* O- M, d" V$ @: U
( O, v. H, N; V; U% r; E U
# G5 H R, t# Z+ H2 i. Y
# |) _- ?5 c, q0 b. c- o6 u(7)' }' P5 b! \# h( H! P7 ^
Figure out the suspected degrees of the individual staff received or sent out the ( d+ Q" W2 v% c: Z4 M8 Winformation, and then rank the suspected degree with decreasing order.; J# V8 H( k% `/ X
We can size down the degree of suspicion through the above three steps. The results( G; C1 X+ H& j. S* A
as follows: E6 r$ ]! ^5 d9 u, k6 n, f9 Y/ A) rTable 2 Suspect sort b' j b1 }& Z$ |% u6 i7 gRank No. Name; @$ s. I% k8 t, U
1 54 Ulf i; G, h( G- q4 z
2 81 Seeni # D* d; K) n0 H# i/ |, T- g5 M7 i3 73 Carina. E! Z- j# A: [+ I3 N: R0 l3 j
4 21 Alex" K3 ~- g; u# g, o, U, m4 F
5 67 Yao+ y F0 O1 ?8 W4 \
6 33 Kim 9 ^6 Z' M1 F7 S% A! i7 a7 49 Harvey , M; E( k; L$ {! G0 q8 7 Elsie $ r1 n- a4 ?( q/ z. C( L9 60 Lars3 H2 x1 _' U& p* u0 M/ m
10 51 Dayi5 L1 |# ~5 F. u X7 J' j
Team#15783 page 9 of 155 h" q6 |& e* f; |0 n
continued0 r5 Y1 r8 A: ?1 P4 f6 L V- \! k$ J
3.5 Consider the additional datas 2 ~8 k. H9 k0 c. g8 N2 x5 aAccording to the meaning of the question, the second question and the first question bring out the best in each other, their model are similar. Just on the basis of the original condition to put more conducive to survey the conditions, so in this question we just improve and tidy the model in the first question. The process of finding core people is similar to the first question. According to the meaning of the question, we put Chris into this crime group, and then calculate respectively the degree of correlation of the new crime group with the company internal group. After that sort them to find out more suspected of personnel. In addition to cofirming suspected information , we according to the characteristics of the corporate crime remaining information confirm that has relationship with the budget and economic , internal personnel dispatch and daily life. In daily life for the standard for stratification, roughly divided into the following levels: A.1,7,11,13 as being suspected uncertainty information, and set the value of suspected degree information at one; B. 14, 2 is definition as the larger suspected degrees information, and set the value of suspected degree information at 0.75; C.5,6,10,15 is definition as the smaller suspected degrees information, and set the value of suspected degree information at 0.5; ; [( V' }$ R# H% ~5 @1 I& G: tD. 3,4,8,9,12 is definition as the smallest suspected degrees information ,and set the value of suspected degree information at 0.25; This can create a correlation matrix as follows:0 j- ]: d- A* N, P6 n, V
Rank + K2 a' M, P1 d) E' ^8 D2 ENo.5 Z+ h! U- B T7 Q* X- ^; _) V. H
Name- Z( X/ ]/ `3 Z1 x4 j' ]: {
11' S6 N/ P* v8 i& A4 I' d9 b
66 $ q" r; A% a4 NMelia / B9 K. O3 K! W# A12% n. h9 }" U2 {- h
57 / H7 J& O4 {7 Y" U8 ZSheng4 E H+ V9 {- q; P5 D- N/ d
130 N5 c5 D0 Q; _% B6 g
18 2 G; ?5 [1 p) I* _: Z( CJean : S2 S! c6 d! w0 M. }. ?14 ! w/ q, S& x/ z' @0 S0 Z43 7 K: C3 S/ D8 ~! yPaul5 A4 q! ^8 k: H: P
15* [) l$ @" B: T! H) Y) P% }
16+ u' R8 J+ |/ n
Jerome ; w/ j- @: @$ F, p, ], c) v% G16' T) ?. Y+ ^# p. n# h, y3 E2 s
56. C0 ^. y+ q+ U* w! o+ w9 h
Cha+ ]* b5 v& h- K# k" s" e
17 t3 U# b9 D5 _463 b! N: Y `1 B d+ u8 I
Louis+ }8 W, o: `$ T% J# D& ^
18 5 e+ B" c. D5 _0 L" g5 j. J- \20 9 w. U7 L9 x5 RCrystal- I9 A" i6 U- x1 z3 @
Team#15783 page 10 of 15 , O& j$ I/ x3 V5 Q6 i$ T0 0 1.25 0, K+ S" i) Y& u2 m, U* i
01 `% L+ s+ E" ?7 }" y
2.25 , {/ @" ?2 R7 L) `: u0.52 V4 d8 b+ O. E$ L: R/ O% d+ F* y
0 0 2 [+ ]* O* F. Z" a0 0 c' T# ?! G* g& z8 M) }" { # P0 z: a. j1 o3 @ 0 I: d% o4 O4 O& _6 X% C
9 X& ]6 r( R; z6 O4 o' T6 o8 Y 0 y$ y# D1 `7 k0 R
7 x0 p! F. Y7 @( Y : B7 a1 o) h2 K. o8 g8 s9 [# T$ m( j , X; e! H. P. t4 w1 M4 I C8 J4 T
1 T5 d5 N/ v* l" T \ 9 q D/ d& Y) H ) p$ r& `! L) [! Z) _
$ L; G2 g- p- W- l3 ` " f6 M) T7 S- z + V, ?) d D; B T$ R& a - k; m& r" X; b, H # M" {* ]8 X8 O" |8 G6 A3 |
(8) 5 D0 R. ~: ~ s4 |4 ?Operator again with the previous methods, we can get the suspected degree of all9 }3 j% l* C7 ^
members . Prioritize on the results obtained above, the suspected persons are as : f9 n# e' |2 y- Y4 l( Hfollowing table' S+ [5 W& y* ]( M# T
Table 3 Suspect sort" E) ]2 V" O% o% ~
4 Computer processing ( U4 ~+ w9 _2 ?4 f9 m4.1 Analysis3 q) J& B Z5 a, ^& Q" [7 b
The criminal process often involves a lot of people. In the detection process, / D8 Q$ p# K# c9 y( K! c( Umanual processing of criminal information is a very complex,and this can easily$ h0 k; f0 x* W0 y) b) J: {
case errors. So we need to find some other ways to reduce errors. / w8 M/ a* I% Q9 J6 ?2 F/ y O With the development of computer technology , computer process data can be 9 ^4 u! G5 R; O l3 G! MRank No. Name3 K3 ~* w% U6 H9 B4 g4 h \
1 54 Ulf 8 E5 `. U1 a8 G2 z! t$ T2 81 Seeni. ^: M) D/ H R9 t# t% o
3 21 Alex 4 ^ t6 u# x. m+ G% D/ T4 73 Carina( i5 K u U5 Z& I/ e2 Q
5 67 Yao* \5 F7 u( O4 Z- z$ L: N
6 33 Kim) s8 X% s$ J/ h
7 49 Harvey - w$ h$ d" Q: e* m* X8 66 Melia 0 J" k0 W9 [6 A/ l* v% B/ U5 k9 7 Elsie8 ]$ k% J2 \0 ^ j
10 2 Paige% C( m8 ^' d; d! A$ `
11 60 Lars8 M) S) j) y' C9 i# _
12 51 Dayi 3 {1 b# `3 n0 b13 56 Cha 3 h" P8 S8 c `14 57 Sheng# Y2 v6 }; d5 \1 {8 Z! n3 `0 j4 o, ~
15 43 Paul* z1 y3 H+ J K/ m/ b6 N
16 16 Jerome: @5 h" l9 Q) E
17 18 Jean 2 o a+ h9 A, x( X# T7 D8 v* `* j; L18 0 Chris* U0 f& c f* s& i5 N
Team#15783 page 11 of 15 2 W* D7 s" p6 ]+ `$ j! mboth作者: 刘李 时间: 2013-1-28 15:49
终于我也快成为初中生啦~数学中国,加油!作者: 果粒 时间: 2013-1-28 17:23
好难懂啊~~现在看到英语就头疼了!但是现在只有硬着头皮看了!!加油加油!!!作者: 刘李 时间: 2013-1-29 09:18
嘿嘿,加油加油~作者: 王jy 时间: 2013-1-29 09:36
看来,网站又升级了哦,呵呵……支持作者: 刘李 时间: 2013-1-29 14:33
我们学校的获奖论文,支持一下~作者: buptwayne 时间: 2014-1-18 19:37
thank you!作者: Augustar_Blue 时间: 2014-1-18 21:26
我天。。。。 作者: 空木葬花 时间: 2014-3-7 12:46
非常感谢楼主的福利!