数学建模社区-数学中国

标题: 为什么 C++ 只比 VBA 快 4倍? [打印本页]

作者: 蕾欧娜    时间: 2015-4-20 10:09
标题: 为什么 C++ 只比 VBA 快 4倍?
用C++和VBA分别写了一段用随机数字测试的值的算法,用500万个随机数,发现VBA需要570毫秒,而C++则需要150毫秒。这也太让人失望了把,C++写起来那么麻烦,起码也要快个几个数量级吧?python就更别说了,居然要7秒钟。求各位大神帮我看看是不是我的代码没优化好?
! v4 o. _5 F8 F# q! Q3 T(平台是Visual Studio,已经开了Release模式)( j+ j8 n7 F. N! [: `4 O
! w1 y4 ]# {1 v6 ~! m/ Z
计算方法:生成,两个在0 到 之间的随机数,数一数这些数字里面有多少个落在了半径为的1/4圆的扇形里面,用这个数字代表扇形面积,用总随机数数量代表正方形面积。因为扇形的面积是 ,而正方形的面积是, 可得知=扇形面积/正方形面积 * 4
! n9 Q' i) \- H# x+ I; G6 _" h& }( w9 Y  g' V8 r* l, m
C++代码:- ^6 |; B% f" i0 s% p
#include "stdafx.h"#include <iostream>#include <time.h>using namespace std;void main(){        double st = clock();        double rand_max = 32767;        srand((int)time(0));        unsigned int simulate_total = 2500000;        unsigned int inside_count = 0;        unsigned int radius = rand_max * rand_max;        unsigned int randA;        unsigned int randB;        unsigned int randA_opp;        unsigned int randB_opp;        for (unsigned int i = 1; i < simulate_total; i++){                randA = rand();                randB = rand();                if ((randA * randA + randB * randB) < radius){                        inside_count++;                }                randA_opp = rand_max - randA;                randB_opp = rand_max - randB;                if ((randA_opp * randA_opp + randB_opp * randB_opp) < radius){                        inside_count++;                }                }        cout << inside_count / double(simulate_total) * 2 << endl;        cout << clock() - st << endl;}
: {$ a9 v. @% t1 ]
* T; Z0 f2 Y0 e; b6 S9 b) v7 y8 o8 S2 D
VBA代码:
5 ]. C2 H( d+ ESub simulate_pi()Dim area_count As Double: area_count = 0Dim simulate_count As Double: simulate_count = 2500000Dim i As DoubleDim randA As Double, randB As DoubleDim randA_opp As Double, randB_opp As DoubleFor i = 1 To simulate_count    randA = Math.Rnd()    randB = Math.Rnd()    randA_opp = 1 - randA    randB_opp = 1 - randB    If randA * randA + randB * randB < 1 Then        area_count = area_count + 1    End If    If randA_opp * randA_opp + randB_opp * randB_opp < 1 Then        area_count = area_count + 1    End IfNext iDebug.Print "Estimate: ", area_count / simulate_count * 2End Sub'VBA内测时间的方法:'新建一个module,把以下代码复制进去,然后运行test.Option ExplicitPrivate Declare Function getFrequency Lib "kernel32" _Alias "QueryPerformanceFrequency" (cyFrequency As Currency) As LongPrivate Declare Function getTickCount Lib "kernel32" _Alias "QueryPerformanceCounter" (cyTickCount As Currency) As Long'Function MicroTimer() As Double'' Returns seconds.'    Dim cyTicks1 As Currency    Static cyFrequency As Currency    '    MicroTimer = 0' Get frequency.    If cyFrequency = 0 Then getFrequency cyFrequency' Get ticks.    getTickCount cyTicks1' Seconds    If cyFrequency Then MicroTimer = cyTicks1 / cyFrequencyEnd FunctionSub test()    Dim st: st = MicroTimer    Call simulate_pi    Debug.Print (MicroTimer - st) * 1000End Sub" W! j+ \7 }" b1 |- y
* {& r; P% F3 J% j; W# x. a2 N
+ T/ e" R4 M5 Y" k6 U- y( n
Python代码:#!/usr/bin/python# Filename : pi_simulate.pyimport randomimport timetime_start = time.perf_counter()inside_count = 0simulate_total = 2500000randA = 0randB = 0for i in range(1, simulate_total):    randA = random.uniform(0,1)    randB = random.uniform(0,1)    if ((randA * randA + randB * randB) < 1):        inside_count = inside_count + 1    randA_opp = 1 - randA    randB_opp = 1 - randB    if ((randA_opp * randA_opp + randB_opp * randB_opp) < 1):        inside_count = inside_count + 1print (inside_count/simulate_total*2)print ("Time spent", time.perf_counter() - time_start)" V0 X$ D1 g3 ?- W& |% `+ b
/ i& }  A9 H3 m) j) k9 B3 ^
/ k! K4 ~; O) E" V





欢迎光临 数学建模社区-数学中国 (http://www.madio.net/) Powered by Discuz! X2.5