The effect of leaf shape on the interception of solar radiation: y+ B- k/ _. o$ t+ a. V
C.B.S. Teh* ' z& h$ c2 M! ODepartment of Land Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, ' C, _: g5 h, E" W" B# mMalaysia ' O! E. D) v6 N/ s; U* a# y5 Abstract & X2 V9 t6 | W& u( c, P. Z; Q1 yOne of the properties of canopy architecture is leaf shape, and its effect on solar radiation - O0 G m {" _# tinterception by a plant is little understood and studied. Consequently, this study was to evaluate9 ^% \4 f" s6 E; @6 V
the effect of six leaf shapes on both direct and diffuse solar radiation interception using a : S& U' H+ o, y6 l0 a4 idetailed 3-D solar radiation model. Six hypothetical plant prototypes were computer-generated. P2 l$ G# J8 }! W) J- n
10 so that each prototype was equal to each other in all aspects; only the leaf shape for each " |6 X4 a: \' Z0 k9 kprototype was varied. The leaf shapes selected were round (RD), square (SQ), triangle (TR)," P. M( w S. v X' L4 E- a; m
inverted triangle (ITR), ellipse (EL) and lobe (LB). Computer simulations revealed that leaf u0 d& d/ H' L
shape did have an effect on direct and diffuse solar radiation interception. However, its effect : n! J% c9 P2 M% E# }5 P7 A3 Awas to a rather small extent of not more than 11% increase in solar radiation interception. The . e- {8 S: Y- s$ }3 y1 O15 mean hourly interception of solar radiation by the prototypes decreased in the following1 A: g- O; V5 Z M, @! ?
manner: (ITR ≈ EL) > (RD ≈ SQ ≈ TR ≈ LB). Although leaf lobbing is often hypothesised to1 E7 f; y4 W a; E2 u
produce deeper sunflecks within the canopy, this study however revealed that leaf lobbing per/ N" ~* _5 r5 s T$ @( ?
se had no effect on solar radiation interception. All properties being equal, solar radiation2 T r& h! ?, _ _1 Y b, a
interception could be increased by having leaf shapes that are: 1) long and narrow, 2) broader at# y8 h! O# Y) U3 m% E. T* x& v
20 the apex than at the basal, and 3) supported by leaf petioles. These three conditions increase& A- B3 V4 X1 y( ^
solar radiation interception by causing the canopy to be spread out more uniformly in the aerial 8 N" q( j2 M2 ~7 m) \# [ pspace; this, in turn, means less leaf clustering and self-shading. However, the effect of leaf 8 M% U% u" n1 g3 r4 Hshape on solar radiation interception decreases for near or full canopy cover because at this / I+ @6 O k6 ?# [9 J! sstage, the canopy is already intercepting solar radiation at near maximum capacity. Leaf shape! ?9 P( N! _4 [
25 also did not affect the diurnal variation of direct and diffuse solar radiation interception. This 5 m( g3 x! R- Ystudy may help to better select crop varieties having the “proper leaf form” for optimum plant6 y3 P- Q% m) N4 | v+ T8 Z0 _% p, {
production, as well as to better understand plant adaptation mechanisms in response to 3 c. Q% W$ @* W" k% lenvironmental stresses.' ]( s0 {! I- E, a) P! [
Keywords: leaf shape; solar radiation; Beer’s law; canopy architecture 0 k) O# Y9 C d1 u. t' V. `% Q4 G. \& I! B+ P
0 E, _* J. I( d M7 ?/ z4 R' d1 V3 F* `% \ leafshape.pdf(409.86 KB, 下载次数: 2)
2014-12-8 17:09 上传
点击文件名下载附件
下载积分: 体力 -2 点
, J4 P* E5 K Q# b8 s# H ) d b z/ b* w# k# Y; m/ i! H' l9 X% x; ?( `% q: F8 r; h
) s) W E* L, L% |1 H# P, |