& o& N9 _% P0 Q5 r. O哈??? $ z: ]- m$ ~1 j j( k1 } f3 Z8 I/ {5 n K: w
Not a chance???$ S' z8 }, H8 g2 J K
' z: ~4 ]0 f Y' o. Z( d, m
#¥+&¥#%&¥%##5 I4 N6 q# k2 ?9 E
& Y0 T2 l: W& L
3 E1 Z2 o9 R5 H! \7 hfuture_check_features(PyFutureFeatures *ff, stmt_ty s, const char *filename) 6 r4 y7 K, T+ ^% O... 2 f5 R/ `. @, Z( z" e1 { else if (strcmp(feature, "braces") == 0) { 1 k$ @% A( [" s. @! T PyErr_SetString(PyExc_SyntaxError,( E% {. j, q( K5 D7 E; u* }
"not a chance"); v* a/ G o) e
PyErr_SyntaxLocation(filename, s->lineno); ( \7 ^" q" {9 k' V4 Q5 B return 0; A/ p1 U& o% U4 n
}/ a+ V: q( D5 D0 |! Y, l- {
: K$ |% L0 ^+ o+ U: P9 u( w1 t Z2 g/ E) f0 y$ R t7 \大家欣赏一下源码,我敬他是个人才…1 W }8 U, H8 o3 F! u
' f9 O' ]/ t$ t+ m0 i1 F& s2 S1 ?
! ~ Q. h7 m y6 t8 P( I5 d8 {2 I 4 [9 E; { a: [- Q2 Q奥,这个我知道,不就是说 Python 语法简单,功能牛批么…1 U# B. q$ z; O; P6 i9 P6 p6 L
果然是…直接。' [9 a8 Q$ e2 E% x
) c' a- R! n9 K9 o2 H6 @' w4 u$ S W; V, v% X
0 M% ~$ b7 {# q5 \/ m
0 E, x4 n, {; U" t" Q " X$ Y: |# G2 [) G9 Q3 P6 @9 d3 z. R; E! D# u1 t7 J2 |
0x04 爱是什么?* P% e) E ]. s; Z- _% S, a4 d
. z, d5 e* u$ T! G* J
9 M9 b# g# }, e. v C! c% @
估计每个 Python 人儿都知道 Python 之禅,不知道也没事,就是下面这个东西: 5 I0 e4 r2 w' _* S7 O3 I$ R. f y l* Z$ W4 K: }9 O4 }1 c
: t6 L: Q+ ^9 O0 E. P1 d>>> import this ( G" \9 z+ o r6 D; f1 * t6 K$ _8 f8 ~' R3 j. n; ` 4 `% U& w( g( s' m一键回车: U" r, i/ x5 Q& z1 j 1 W3 S& M4 d6 _7 n. e2 M! ^3 ^7 ^" [) \% W
The Zen of Python, by Tim Peters . R% g" ~3 t- G8 G3 T d) g- q7 z8 A6 v$ ?% k- ?
Beautiful is better than ugly.! C1 l* o2 n# W2 ~, ~+ L
Explicit is better than implicit.) ^( n L4 `/ |* E9 R& G
Simple is better than complex. ) \- \3 J9 j! Z+ O q& g7 |# W3 bComplex is better than complicated. 1 F! r" V( Q% G' R# @Flat is better than nested. ; R+ B j' G$ y, iSparse is better than dense. ) N& a+ `- W9 Q0 KReadability counts. : R( ?) ~8 a& D8 U* Q) O/ bSpecial cases aren't special enough to break the rules.* a( b- q9 h: B3 @4 d+ u- [5 y
Although practicality beats purity.( f/ A& d% W6 s. v
Errors should never pass silently. & z# p- b) V( N- x0 u( D3 ZUnless explicitly silenced.$ T6 X: @6 X; j- R8 L8 ^
In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess. , [ g& D$ F( U( P1 PThere should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.* ]4 V" ~8 C( r q3 h t" R1 Y* [7 R
Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.1 t3 l/ [+ w0 ?) }
Now is better than never. ' a8 I2 l+ r0 E1 x$ u0 t. JAlthough never is often better than *right* now. 6 T- S+ l, G1 G. j% q eIf the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea. , X( _4 K' G) gIf the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.& W1 L$ r& H- p2 S; D5 b
Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!( O% u$ |, k% r" e7 @6 U1 ^0 z
1 M, a8 \9 Y1 m' z* p! Z4 N
具体翻译如下: 4 T1 s0 a" m$ o- |' x/ D8 [9 z3 U9 Z! ^& p
@6 i- t# a* N( R$ u7 I: C好好学习 6 U# c; e6 H/ M7 j* E! z天天向上 ! C, {# Y* D1 `0 c # ]2 w$ l1 g% r+ y ; Q- d9 r" b+ G. |9 i1 T" J* p
( l+ X' H Y+ c A6 M2 X& y- c
this 是什么? ' U( m+ }) ~4 ^经过我的剽窃,啊不,参考…7 O# [0 e* q( P/ {8 O
this 是爱啊…& y5 f; A7 b2 @: i
) V* L E+ i2 A) n 1 ~( B9 e0 f+ t+ ]3 _: E>>> love = this % c- Z5 T. A, p$ u/ D# L>>> this is love: T, W/ x9 {, M0 }
True- q: O" H( M& x- p
5 O# @8 W3 K9 ^, L( N# Z