The effect of leaf shape on the interception of solar radiation7 q7 V- i: M' Q5 E6 U
C.B.S. Teh*0 S7 c; G$ @# `3 j! ^2 P
Department of Land Management, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, - u; b! g# C# M5 R0 SMalaysia. D7 H, K r3 B$ ^5 P
5 Abstract4 g6 |8 y$ u) Q
One of the properties of canopy architecture is leaf shape, and its effect on solar radiation , p; K- @7 [, y4 Zinterception by a plant is little understood and studied. Consequently, this study was to evaluate 4 p) D. p0 V4 C# U" u7 ?+ n% Uthe effect of six leaf shapes on both direct and diffuse solar radiation interception using a, r# ]+ d) ~+ N0 v1 O0 K! U
detailed 3-D solar radiation model. Six hypothetical plant prototypes were computer-generated7 ^- W% R5 [. T! f1 p0 Y
10 so that each prototype was equal to each other in all aspects; only the leaf shape for each ) B+ }* c1 J% k- \prototype was varied. The leaf shapes selected were round (RD), square (SQ), triangle (TR), 5 n. t/ Q$ V W4 Linverted triangle (ITR), ellipse (EL) and lobe (LB). Computer simulations revealed that leaf/ q& W5 U+ i Z# i" b
shape did have an effect on direct and diffuse solar radiation interception. However, its effect $ ~3 R- @0 ]& z1 `# W" Owas to a rather small extent of not more than 11% increase in solar radiation interception. The 0 v: `5 e, _+ d, Z" s! u& u15 mean hourly interception of solar radiation by the prototypes decreased in the following : a6 z; q# _* {$ a/ Q% Umanner: (ITR ≈ EL) > (RD ≈ SQ ≈ TR ≈ LB). Although leaf lobbing is often hypothesised to b. U" ]) X$ B* m
produce deeper sunflecks within the canopy, this study however revealed that leaf lobbing per ( m% d3 x! \6 r; c! m) o% A9 Q3 @se had no effect on solar radiation interception. All properties being equal, solar radiation , M9 x. s, H6 J' @interception could be increased by having leaf shapes that are: 1) long and narrow, 2) broader at " w/ F6 I4 f0 }20 the apex than at the basal, and 3) supported by leaf petioles. These three conditions increase & n E5 B6 p' `5 N: Gsolar radiation interception by causing the canopy to be spread out more uniformly in the aerial9 U$ K& ` z `
space; this, in turn, means less leaf clustering and self-shading. However, the effect of leaf 7 H; s9 j& d" D+ i+ Mshape on solar radiation interception decreases for near or full canopy cover because at this / a7 q9 k% A0 }' x$ Fstage, the canopy is already intercepting solar radiation at near maximum capacity. Leaf shape ( o: p" K* L6 a/ l25 also did not affect the diurnal variation of direct and diffuse solar radiation interception. This $ @* h, l- z- f- I t, ustudy may help to better select crop varieties having the “proper leaf form” for optimum plant - A# D5 J1 k* Kproduction, as well as to better understand plant adaptation mechanisms in response to' x5 I, E7 M! I; l$ ?* _6 x
environmental stresses. 2 A& K( [% a( |' n- Q" y0 Z/ g1 }Keywords: leaf shape; solar radiation; Beer’s law; canopy architecture # b% D/ ^2 V4 f% D V0 ` 3 H+ ?. C* b3 @0 U. n ( d+ F5 o @- q6 C' p8 E" a# b% V8 B t# J8 l leafshape.pdf(409.86 KB, 下载次数: 2)
2014-12-8 17:09 上传
点击文件名下载附件
下载积分: 体力 -2 点
1 C% d% ~: A, @( w * M1 ?" X; q5 A4 T9 e" {$ M, P; y6 v* v