2 M- ^: T6 j, K, @% y, J$ lprint('train score: {}'.format(ridge.score(X_train, y_train))) #预测训练集的准确度7 X2 @2 [6 X7 V! T I4 n5 P% B
print('test score: {}'.format(ridge.score(X_test, y_test))) #预测测试集的准确度 8 s# b% f n) O5 @+ D / R% a, x2 q+ V1 g3 z8 Y; ]" ? % R! Z$ x5 _3 D- B4 S* c1% s0 u ^' @7 q; @) I
2 , C; G& [. Y! D6 w! [. V3 $ _ o" B ]4 `: T! r4 + y9 x! U* C% ~! u+ v7 N) Y/ Y5 5 p, c. p8 Y+ x3 s6 + E Z) a8 d0 S! l# |: }72 z' b, [$ |# o3 j3 {
8 0 L. T& N; A6 o8 n, o) ~9 2 j! }- Q6 g6 N# S9 N q) r: d103 f9 r- l( D3 Y! p/ b3 o
11 k/ w3 i u# H8 `
12 2 X/ [5 l9 d* k& D& w- c7 d13. C7 y4 Z' r& T+ B
14 8 A6 l3 w3 ?- E$ I+ ]* ]15' k3 v7 G4 ]$ \+ b& n @
16 6 [+ V. P5 p7 m17; ^" j2 k6 }& ]$ x/ _4 @% D
18. `! R0 X/ X9 W0 h4 {$ e! k
19, X. b- ~/ P0 t. j, U
20! d3 P0 y9 r8 G+ |/ }
216 ^8 z2 P3 g# j D* i: B" k' C
运行结果- N. ?+ P8 t7 x* X& u% j
5 \) R4 I {- Y1 V( g6 ]
train score: 0.85562482602875915 y7 p6 v1 z$ ~7 U+ q# G- f
test score: 0.8605931411425929; ^. F0 r: i7 f' q# A" d. I/ H
1 # X. \* d' e5 r3 v* m+ _6 ?27 a4 @& R0 o1 l5 L& }8 p7 H( X
此时发现,训练集与测试集的预测结果相近,属于欠拟合的情况,即特征数较少的情况,即特征系数w接近0的情况,属于过度正则。我们可以适当缩减alpha,从而减少正则,增加特征的影响,再次测试。/ E! |: c/ ]; R' \
5 l" ?! w0 Y2 B" ~7 s zfrom sklearn.linear_model import Ridge 3 l, `2 l2 y8 L1 f. s' hfrom sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split4 O3 q+ m' ], M( Y
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt : [% [; p. m! ]+ p% l# I. {# Ximport numpy as np0 o' i1 x4 R I+ G, D. l. F
\* R5 J3 Z% } 7 o n' J* K X! v#生成506个样本和105个导出特征的房价信息数据集- K+ v" T) K: i4 n
X, y = mglearn.datasets.load_extended_boston()/ n* _ O8 G" u5 K+ O5 ]" D/ _
3 L2 k5 B" z+ z' V4 z0 T) `
2 @' B/ d" Z) u
#将数据集拆分为 训练集与测试集 % C4 _. V9 C9 a4 _+ jX_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y) ?6 q, J) X% r# s6 ^3 ]/ A* ]$ u [6 F1 n) i; k
& _$ [/ V* j' S% j* V+ g5 v; ?$ {: i
#默认alpha为1,调整为0.1,减少正则影响 Y8 f) e! y. _0 v, Zridge = Ridge(alpha=0.1).fit(X_train, y_train) ' x8 p# X9 K5 B1 }9 T 8 G3 l1 s! n- J' w. o 2 q# h; K5 k4 H ^! R: Sprint('train score: {}'.format(ridge.score(X_train, y_train))) #预测训练集的准确度 0 m/ e8 `8 G0 B) I) r" t- K8 l- zprint('test score: {}'.format(ridge.score(X_test, y_test))) #预测测试集的准确度 ! Q$ l: L6 i6 b( H6 }$ @* v4 D! M6 i$ E
5 V J9 A' ^3 i, V
1 * n: h2 ]& h, O2 o2 7 r( o- z' v. J/ x( L! @4 B8 N1 g0 Z; x3 * P1 y! j! q. g49 v% {5 G& M( c2 Z( W( c
59 j* R: x. G3 D/ t' ~- X4 f
6 ; B. p* _+ V2 C m7 V- k9 b7' F6 K0 a6 X4 |# ?( o/ U
8 ! q( z1 {. C! v) H( |; G; g; Q: t95 m6 y/ Q( f) q) m! y+ Q
10; x5 j9 `! }0 A/ D' Q% f8 v
112 V; B$ h( E; E$ r5 j m
12 4 {1 s; C$ }3 D- F9 G& n q- N136 M* l) P, i: c! @. T( @0 R
14& i9 s! W# e1 }2 m; Y
154 Q$ ~4 W3 P6 Q. |: v* \( `3 m5 E( L
16 w- F6 `, U" ]. H; x
17) z8 m4 @0 F; V3 j
187 c0 I8 W0 t$ W# I6 ~# \& W
19 5 o* W& G/ G- f! c) `4 L) l8 v208 m# ?0 N; |" @, |) o
21( `+ H( Z0 c0 n. i4 o( H' m
运行结果 1 E/ U. ^( A0 F9 A8 q# \5 P9 R9 n - T5 X% B( s. Y/ Wtrain score: 0.8953944927234415 / `6 D( g1 Q/ Z0 k" Ltest score: 0.9204136280805639 3 E# a* X2 L, H/ E6 @: t1) g! [) O! t+ { |8 m
2 : i3 J$ X* m" {可见,训练集与测试集的预测准确度有所提升,但是再对alpha进行调小,可能会由于特征系数变大、斜率变大造成过拟合,从而造成训练集的预测结果高,测试集的预测结果低,出现不泛化的现象。 3 R( L2 W7 g5 e0 B( D9 I# E2 ^* J / h9 K& Z; w# d7 DLasso回归 ; A* r, {) G/ B9 Q: C' w* b% P6 {Lasso回归与Ridge回归较为相似,也是采用正则化的方式,控制特征系数w,从而达到泛化稳定效果,不过Lasso采用正则化L1的方法。+ i. }$ Q# i# V2 t% U
- Q, j9 H8 a; f' }, v. K
与Ridge不同的是,应用情景若仅有几条重要特征时,使用Lasso较为可能更好,更容易理解。7 `; ~4 N% |0 z1 H
3 C9 V4 W8 q$ q
from sklearn.linear_model import Lasso 2 i1 @% X2 t) W5 V7 Afrom sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split ) f' j7 R3 ^+ h8 R" D: T; Gimport matplotlib.pyplot as plt 1 h; \. Y/ F: L9 C5 @import numpy as np % w4 W0 ~3 A1 r+ V- [) g0 z: q J: D1 e1 l5 j' n+ A
! I: C$ ]+ T- n
#生成506个样本和105个导出特征的房价信息数据集 ( S9 F+ B7 l+ Q& N( z7 y aX, y = mglearn.datasets.load_extended_boston() 9 w b# R6 C0 \3 l( k, L 7 y6 ?1 q9 i4 I, P / K9 F9 _2 T6 ~$ [2 Z#将数据集拆分为 训练集与测试集 7 q9 p- G, U# n6 aX_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y)5 {* l2 Z% m) A7 X% |
2 I, U; V1 |2 b# W: @% f- a7 C& Y3 j
* h( W4 z3 j; h4 k# y
#默认alpha为1 ) P8 i* H O4 c |( ?5 Ulasso = Lasso().fit(X_train, y_train) 6 L! F( J. R3 O3 L- F v5 ]# g9 k; d; P% \9 N
# f/ V9 m! E! L9 x1 t' C+ z8 K
print('train score: {}'.format(lasso.score(X_train, y_train))) #预测训练集的准确度% }; U; i) s( \/ t" o) j" E
print('test score: {}'.format(lasso.score(X_test, y_test))) #预测测试集的准确度 2 w6 K; p( ~3 k$ u _4 B4 gprint('feature num: {}'.format(np.sum(lasso.coef_ != 0))) #Lasso模型特征系数不为0个数 9 I1 x& R) x0 g+ _5 G 6 F6 B. x/ j( n8 v$ h) y1 Q' q0 F5 h. }4 t! l+ Y
1 # V" s% c: X4 I! {8 x6 `! c1 q2 + L* |( O8 ?- O. T2 v2 w9 i; m3 - H* f: i! b) E4 ) B3 M; i5 _) a u( f' p5 6 _( `: l C( z60 }* H6 x& s; m& K6 @; _
7 2 `+ z+ n1 k4 p1 b5 v& o) Z6 d8$ u5 u, w: K( R0 j6 L: m
9 5 R4 F& {; V( Q+ K3 w f! Q10 : l* L5 @- }' C112 `2 Q t- e2 D( o
12 \% n- m' N$ C# ~2 z( k! ?
139 k; \1 P, l2 p- d7 {& O' Z' ? O
147 v6 A3 s8 z9 i& n5 l" p: d
15 5 C! w' a" i$ B( u9 Z) C ~16" u' L# C6 y. t& U
17$ t# |, s3 @: x6 ?0 U
18 8 `( R' s' K7 X/ g5 E; p9 e19 " }1 W1 a+ k3 g) c3 D20# J3 _: b8 }* B" x, [$ W. @
21 " A) U1 y- h% W1 w8 W9 z22 & V$ I% o8 ^. ~' r2 i, X运行结果2 D' O3 s: x' M( `4 V( ?
! I# F! G# i) {. n1 ttrain score: 0.2609501463003341* E* p$ F+ U R- m: S
test score: 0.229144976160079561 M8 w g1 B2 {0 }6 Z
feature num: 3' O$ b1 r& S+ c
1' p; H1 D; W @" D) b
2 ^* B' N8 Y1 X' I38 m5 y" S) t. T
可以看出,Lasso在训练集与测试集的预测结果都比较差劲,105个特征仅用到了3个,正则化过于严重,对alpha参数进行调整,减少约束,可得 + S$ J x/ A) p) b1 q) _1 l $ ~0 r. w' P0 h+ D5 Vfrom sklearn.linear_model import Lasso( M2 K% K' F, s M, C4 l* M
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split8 q5 S) h {. w' @) T+ R% q
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt4 E4 |: F# J h3 X0 |2 _3 K. E! u
import numpy as np 5 n/ B, U% [+ f$ ?; _$ h' L 7 P6 d! \4 R0 w: |! { * _8 g0 F2 Z) U+ l2 l9 s#生成506个样本和105个导出特征的房价信息数据集( ^6 I+ i& \# u
X, y = mglearn.datasets.load_extended_boston() ! [" \: ^4 }$ z 1 B& o3 r$ _& p8 P# _2 B8 R) k1 z& y" \4 s' g' f
#将数据集拆分为 训练集与测试集# w% z: ~- `+ {0 F; g8 r3 `
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y) ) _6 Q2 b9 |$ ^& f# D1 Q, U; I / E- K2 Z# ?3 \" X % w" y; }. H1 `. S1 D+ E#默认alpha为1,调整为0.001,减少正则影响,并增大迭代最大次数 ! E# p, I: D. ]1 w" V5 tlasso = Lasso(alpha=0.001, max_iter=100000).fit(X_train, y_train) & Q" Q5 w3 R1 {( M$ s6 K; b0 G* F8 s i5 f( o0 a
' @- a2 u6 ~ z# ~. I. M
print('train score: {}'.format(lasso.score(X_train, y_train))) #预测训练集的准确度 7 e8 [( m* J/ X' gprint('test score: {}'.format(lasso.score(X_test, y_test))) #预测测试集的准确度 ' h0 @% m% D' B% E3 F: x. X6 m+ Qprint('feature num: {}'.format(np.sum(lasso.coef_ != 0))) #Lasso模型特征系数不为0个数6 C' j8 e4 Y u1 ?* M
6 r' t0 d8 l0 S
$ o' U! U& w( c/ v% u1. k1 O! R0 R% o
2) T0 H$ L$ R2 x; Q2 r
3; o8 N6 e) N3 y; K1 E9 I) G
4 6 p& Z, D* T9 Z5 g, i5 R* ~) E5 y4 i2 l$ d, a x; O
6 ( @1 A: k6 H- I' @& _ x79 q1 x- i X+ ], e
87 O" Z# y& c; k2 k: \: r# l
9+ R2 a" l. {$ B5 e( H- Z
10 % _$ V, K( r( z b11 . Y- G: f8 h( i$ G12& g, j, K. r" S$ X D, h
13 + M/ k2 ~5 F5 T e/ R( w14 : y- W3 Z C3 \2 u! c& N* d ?15 3 L( Y- g6 s8 Y/ o, s$ ?8 R16 + ~6 ]& y3 A f7 P' e' I5 a3 A: c171 u, @2 }7 y' d1 R2 R0 N7 N
18 3 Q: c5 H5 t! Q o19 4 V1 _! k# I+ P3 O205 d ~# V. k7 Y& Y# h8 b( a0 N
216 ~- x6 L4 M. L, K+ T6 p( C, o5 o
22 ( `; O9 w. c: s( x' M. [! s T运行结果 / C/ T7 C' ?# h/ w, W* g+ b6 T 5 Q& v; l1 ]3 L& M; htrain score: 0.9126076194281942$ w, T0 u% {1 a/ ?2 E
test score: 0.9174465452887482 1 X! N- _' Z. ?. Ffeature num: 73 ) y, V" z" }' u% b) W18 D4 F ~$ s" D, W2 k7 p
2 - n Z& r0 k+ j" N9 S( c3 . ~' n+ b: ]) ]7 @; h训练集和测试集的预测结果均有了明显提升,且用到的特征系数也有73个。 7 W9 X9 T- `. I# A; Z* {3 C ) w! D6 B1 E7 p) K假设再次缩减正则的影响:0 e5 }8 K2 m* O/ b
2 C% O; V9 v( `( t) `* \" mfrom sklearn.linear_model import Lasso3 x7 F4 x; j; V; s9 L( J2 K# t
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split! V, B* z1 J8 k
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt5 \! D9 Z+ v' K. G# q0 D! U
import numpy as np ( Y5 h6 P+ a4 z# J* t 0 H! {: ~4 L- _5 v 6 G6 W$ P" y$ j, N" t#生成506个样本和105个导出特征的房价信息数据集 . h, s; k0 D( m# xX, y = mglearn.datasets.load_extended_boston() 1 z y. ~" A1 e# k7 y/ Y8 ^ 5 Y" C; f& }4 B" L6 L9 L1 g 3 T* `' i0 c. P8 A3 T, K#将数据集拆分为 训练集与测试集. w3 @, `. D/ R
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y)& ~5 R- a2 z, u